From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 4 22:35:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB971065672 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 22:35:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexbestms@uni-muenster.de) Received: from SECMAIL.UNI-MUENSTER.DE (SECMAIL.UNI-MUENSTER.DE [128.176.192.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F6F8FC0A for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 22:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by SECMAIL.UNI-MUENSTER.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7315BF407 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 00:35:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by gwaa12 with SMTP id a12so68010gwa.13 for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:35:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.237.19 with SMTP id k19mr11393973ybh.393.1275690923474; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:35:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.178.13 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:35:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 00:35:23 +0200 Message-ID: From: Alexander Best To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: strange scsi/CAM related dmesg output X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:35:26 -0000 hi there. running HEAD, amd64 and r208806 i get this dmesg output which doesn't look right: ada0 at ahcich2 bus 0 scbus3 target 0 lun 0 ada0: ATA-7 SATA 2.x device ada0: 300.000MB/s transferscd0 at ata2 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 33.300MB/s transfers (UDMA2, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 65534bytes) cd0: cd present [1944656 x 2048 byte records] (SATA 2.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes) ada0: Command Queueing enabled ada0: 238474MB (488395055 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) my kernel contains: options SC_HISTORY_SIZE=1000 options MSGBUF_SIZE=65536 options PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=128 might this be caused by one of these lines? cheers. -- Alexander Best