From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jul 2 19:09:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA08832 for current-outgoing; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 19:09:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache.relcom.ru [194.58.229.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA08815 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 19:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.8.6/8.8.5) id GAA00291; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 06:08:58 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 06:08:54 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= To: FreeBSD-current , Brian Somers cc: Chuck Robey , Joerg Wunsch Subject: Re: ppp & HUP. In-Reply-To: <199707022132.WAA07880@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 2 Jul 1997, Brian Somers wrote: > > > reboot(8) will send SIGTERMs to the processes, but not SIGHUPs. > > death() in init.c :( I start thinking that sending HUP from init is a bug because: 1) It increase disk activity just before shutdown since all daemons re-read their configs. 2) It cause redials for redial-able software as uucp (and ppp some time ago). If nobody will explain why this HUP is neded (hanging shells perfectly killed by SIGKILL), I'll remove HUP sending from init. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/