From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 14 22:08:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CD616A4CE for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:08:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5AC43D39 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:08:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 86F77526B3; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:08:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:08:37 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Edwin Groothuis Message-ID: <20050114220835.GC74151@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050113062739.GA28658@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050113180504.GA26064@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050114130404.250d6e26@apircalabu.dsd.ro> <20050114112918.GF69532@voodoo.oberon.net> <20050114211206.GF1175@k7.mavetju> <20050114215559.GA71927@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050114220344.GH1175@k7.mavetju> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050114220344.GH1175@k7.mavetju> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Kirill Ponomarew cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: HEADS UP: pkg-plist strict enforcement starting X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:08:39 -0000 --DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:03:44AM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 01:55:59PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > This keeps getting suggested under various names, but you need to > > solve the compatibility problem. >=20 > Isn't that resolved by modifying ports/sysutils/pkg_install and > noting it in ports/UPDATING? That would be a big cop-out - it's hardly friendly to make every port user update to -stable or take manual steps to avoid a broken package system. There needs to be a better solution than that. Kris --DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB6ELjWry0BWjoQKURAsxCAKC/9LykXo5b62N2pApRgMKja7UbVQCePSla 2R4Nos7RWPweBhFgL/j09dI= =lGTz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi--