From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Jun 4 16:13:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from espresso.q9media.com (espresso.q9media.com [216.254.138.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6B037B407 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 16:13:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mike@localhost) by espresso.q9media.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g54N8DR42084; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 19:08:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike) Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 19:08:13 -0400 From: Mike Barcroft To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Bruce Evans , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Removing wait union Message-ID: <20020604190813.D98086@espresso.q9media.com> References: <20020602010108.B16166@espresso.q9media.com> <20020603011903.Y2566-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <20020603190818.E16166@espresso.q9media.com> <20020604140957.A63493@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020604140957.A63493@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 02:09:57PM -0700 Organization: The FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kris Kennaway writes: > 19 ports failed, and 3152+465 port builds were attempted. Assuming > the same percentage of the rest will fail that comes to around 36 > ports failing out of 7000 in the collection. > > I'd be happy with the patch going in as long as someone commits to > fixing them. I think is currently C++ unsafe, so it's likely that the C++ breakage isn't hiding additional bugs. As a side effect, I believe this patch fixes C++, though I haven't checked. I'm willing to investigate the ports that break, if you can provide a list. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message