From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 25 13:20:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C466DF99 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [78.47.246.247]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49E252740 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:20:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s5PDCiON085294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:12:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from eugen@eg.sd.rdtc.ru) X-Envelope-From: eugen@eg.sd.rdtc.ru X-Envelope-To: mike@sentex.net Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s5PDCcql083137 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:12:38 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from eugen@eg.sd.rdtc.ru) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s5PDCbGc083136; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:12:37 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from eugen) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:12:37 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein To: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: nfs slowdown (RELENG_8) Message-ID: <20140625131237.GA82922@rdtc.ru> References: <2091718059.2982836.1403563319620.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> <53A978D1.2000207@sentex.net> <53A987AE.8060708@sentex.net> <53A9DC0D.2000705@sentex.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53A9DC0D.2000705@sentex.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay * domain * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hz.grosbein.net Cc: Rick Macklem , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:20:28 -0000 On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:14:05PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > But if I do > # cat /dev/zero > /nfsbackup/test > > Its down to 25Mb/s > > Now, if this were consistent across all my boxes, I would not be too > interested. > > Why is cat with a redirect so much slower, and why slower just on some > boxes and not others ?!?! cat(1) tries to determine optimal I/O block size by evaluating st_blksize of its stdout. Try to run: ktrace cat /dev/zero > /nfsbackup/test And then use kdump and see what block size does cat(1) use while writing to stdout? Eugene Grosbein