From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 10 18:39:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02A516A417 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:39:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karl@FS.denninger.net) Received: from FS.denninger.net (wsip-70-169-168-7.pn.at.cox.net [70.169.168.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54EB743D45 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:39:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from karl@FS.denninger.net) Received: from fs.denninger.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by FS.denninger.net (8.13.6/8.13.1) with SMTP id k8AIdwp4035739 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:39:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from karl@FS.denninger.net) Received: from fs.denninger.net [127.0.0.1] by Spamblock-sys (LOCAL); Sun Sep 10 13:39:58 2006 Received: (from karl@localhost) by FS.denninger.net (8.13.6/8.13.1/Submit) id k8AIdwp0035736 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:39:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from karl) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:39:58 -0500 From: Karl Denninger To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060910183958.GA35701@FS.denninger.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20060909182831.GA32004@FS.denninger.net> <200609100159.k8A1xAIn089481@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20060910150526.GA31323@FS.denninger.net> <20060910151817.H8856@psg.com> <20060910181331.GA35166@FS.denninger.net> <20060910183631.GA6406@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060910183631.GA6406@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: Karl's Sushi and Packet Smashers X-Die-Spammers: Spammers cheerfully broiled for supper and served with ketchup! Subject: Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:40:00 -0000 On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 02:36:31PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 01:13:31PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 03:21:33PM +0000, Patrick J Okui wrote: > > > On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, Karl Denninger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >Once the -RELEASE branch is taken, code updates there . > > > > > > > > > > I take it you haven't read the text in the handbook that has been > > > linked to by a few posters. > > > > > > You can track changes to a particular release - say by using > > > RELENG_6_1 rather than RELENG_6. In which case, would you still > > > say you are tracking STABLE? > > > > Yes. > > > > If I track RELENG_6 (once 6.0-RELEASE has gone out) then I'm by definition > > tracking -STABLE. > > > > Indeed, the current tag on my CVS tree is TRELENG_6! > > Not the question he asked, please re-read. > > Kris Yes it is, in the general case; in any event if you track RELENG_6_1 you will get no bug fixes in general - security related items to filter back down but in general bug reports posted against a -RELEASE are, if addressed, put into -STABLE. -- -- Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do! http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING! http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind