From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 20 23:10:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9286316A47B for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:10:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6058643D45 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:10:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8KNAPOK091012 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:10:25 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8KNAPmD091011; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:10:25 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:10:25 GMT Message-Id: <200609202310.k8KNAPmD091011@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Rob Austein Cc: Subject: Re: conf/103428: devd(8): devd brings up network interfaces early and wrong X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Rob Austein List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:10:26 -0000 The following reply was made to PR conf/103428; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Rob Austein To: Brooks Davis Cc: Rob Austein , freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/103428: devd(8): devd brings up network interfaces early and wrong Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:02:40 -0400 > The following coupled with manually setting ipv6_network_interfaces > might be a decent option for now. Er, the first return in ipv6if() needs to be 1, not 0 (if IPv6 is disabled system-wide, don't bring it up on this interface), but other than that, this patch worked and seems like a reasonable stopgap. > Eventually I think we'll want to adjust the way this stuff works a > fair bit, but there's a limit to how much we can change in stable > since we definitely don't want to break existing setups. Completely understand, and agree. Thanks!