From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug  1 23:52:37 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D65CA37B401; Fri,  1 Aug 2003 23:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org [216.136.204.115])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 705B943FAF; Fri,  1 Aug 2003 23:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from julian@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h726qb0U066612;
	Fri, 1 Aug 2003 23:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from julian@repoman.freebsd.org)
Received: (from julian@localhost)
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h726qaUs066611;
	Fri, 1 Aug 2003 23:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200308020652.h726qaUs066611@repoman.freebsd.org>
From: Julian Elischer <julian@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 23:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD
Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 sys_machdep.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 06:52:38 -0000

julian      2003/08/01 23:52:36 PDT

  FreeBSD src repository

  Modified files:
    sys/i386/i386        sys_machdep.c 
  Log:
  Relax the check for bad LDTE allocations. It turns out that
  there is code that blindly allocates LDTEs starting at slot 6
  and I quess it doesn't really matter to us if they overwrite the BSDI
  syscall slot, since it isn't a BSDI binary. Also add some code to help track
  down other such users (commented out for now).
  
  Reviewed by:    deischen@
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.87      +21 -4     src/sys/i386/i386/sys_machdep.c