Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 02 Feb 2016 15:36:52 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 206840] x11-fm/doublecmd: Update to 0.7R6569, Fix build
Message-ID:  <bug-206840-13-D8gNckZ08e@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-206840-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-206840-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206840

--- Comment #4 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Be=C3=B1at Gonzalez Etxepare from comment #2)

But yes, 0.7.0.R6569 is OK as well. Personally (having read the upstream pa=
ge
on the 0.7.0 alpha, I'd opt for:

PORTVERSION=3D 0.7.0.a<build> or

DISTVERSION=3D0.7.0alpha<build>

As these are closer to the upstream designation of 'alpha', rather than R<b=
uild
to denote a revision.

As long as a PORTEPOCH bump is avoided, and future versions will be > than =
this
one, we're good.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-206840-13-D8gNckZ08e>