From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 23 23:30:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7603416A41F; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:30:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.village.org (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11C543D4C; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:30:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6NNSfco023535; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:28:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:29:34 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20050723.172934.90795601.imp@bsdimp.com> To: grog@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20050723230454.GC842@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <42E29269.4030305@root.org> <20050723.131529.31252138.imp@bsdimp.com> <20050723230454.GC842@wantadilla.lemis.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, ache@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, core@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, nate@root.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/games/fortune/fortune fortune.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:30:53 -0000 In message: <20050723230454.GC842@wantadilla.lemis.com> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" writes: : > not kludge around it with 1980's microsecond technology. : : I can't see that there's much of a security implication in fortune. : But now it's broken again. Does that improve our security situation? The problem is that if there's something wrong with /dev/random, that must be fixed. Fortune has no security implications, but if it is bleating at us that there's a problem, then we must listen to it, not paper it over. Warner