Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 17:06:17 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: davidg@root.com Cc: terry@lambert.org, wollman@lcs.mit.edu, bde@zeta.org.au, bakul@netcom.com, current@freefall.freebsd.org, hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: getdtablesize() broken? Message-ID: <199510190006.RAA01335@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199510182230.PAA29572@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Oct 18, 95 03:30:06 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> about the memory-fragmentation issues which mandate the use of a > >> separate VM submap to hold this data while it is being staged between > >> the old process and the new process. > > > >BZZZZT! Replace the enviornment with logical names and hang the logical > >name table off the proc struct instead of copying it like this and it > >won't *need* to be staged. Bye bye, staging area. Mark the environment > >as a shared copy-on-modification structure. > > BZZZZT! Not if you want argv[] to work. We're not talking about just the > environment variables. Damn. I thought this was for envp. 8-(. Never mind on that one, then. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510190006.RAA01335>