From owner-cvs-all Fri Jan 7 6: 8:42 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from freebsd.dk (freebsd.dk [212.242.42.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EE2156DD; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 06:08:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sos@freebsd.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.1) id PAA07994; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 15:07:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos) From: Soren Schmidt Message-Id: <200001071407.PAA07994@freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/burncd burncd.c In-Reply-To: <3875EBA2.51CCF3B8@dons.net.au> from "Daniel O'Connor" at "Jan 8, 2000 00:05:30 am" To: darius@dons.net.au (Daniel O'Connor) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 15:07:33 +0100 (CET) Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, sos@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk It seems Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > > Soren Schmidt wrote: > > Hmm, thats not foolproof either. What would you set it to ? > > The default? :) > (Power on default..) Hmm, could do that, but chances are it will be just as bad as the one burcd left it in... > Hmm.. basically I was just wondering if you could end up in a state > where you nuked a cdburning with -9 and consequently couldn't mount a CD. The drive will most likely be so confused that you cant use it for anything without a reboot anyway, at least its been that 9 out of 10 times I've broken off the process... > > Another thing is that it is very unwise to kill the burning process, > > it is garantied to leave the medium useless, that was why I'd do > > signal catching to prevent that. > > Well, there are reasons for stopping a burn even if you are going to > screw the disk up.. Sure, but the odds for using the drive afterwards are minimal, sadly... -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message