From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Thu Dec 1 17:01:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4F5C61CF7; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FD571614; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D47A15F2; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:01:17 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:01:16 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Ian Lepore Cc: Ngie Cooper , "Conrad E. Meyer" , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r309344 - head/lib/libutil Message-ID: <20161201170116.GA20872@lonesome.com> References: <201612010221.uB12Lb6x067202@repo.freebsd.org> <4DFE017D-90FD-44F4-8FE7-7EE53D499F7B@gmail.com> <1480609927.1889.189.camel@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1480609927.1889.189.camel@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 17:01:25 -0000 On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:32:07AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 19:07 -0800, Ngie Cooper wrote: > > Really?? I wish you hadn't added me to this list.. I don't in any way > > endorse the way that you went about dealing with this disagreement. > > Really?  Well then feel free to ADD my name to the list of people who > found that comment, and the subsequent non-response to the complaints > about it, completely inappropriate.   I expressed an opinion on an IRC channel that I found the comment offensive. But I would rather my permission had been asked ahead of time before having that comment attached to a public commit log. I think this is part of the point that ngie is trying to make. I'm well-known for my wish that core took a more active, public, stance on such matters, but I think here that two wrongs may not have made a right. mcl