From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 17 20:20:47 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976FC16A46C; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:20:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5381F13C457; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:20:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.61.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F8317107; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9HKKjTu052117; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:20:46 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Julian Elischer From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:08:05 MST." <47166BA5.1000100@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:20:45 +0000 Message-ID: <52116.1192652445@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: arch@freebsd.org, "Constantine A. Murenin" Subject: Re: sensors fun.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:20:47 -0000 In message <47166BA5.1000100@elischer.org>, Julian Elischer writes: >> Having a userland >> interface also makes it easier to have backends that are entirely in >> userland. >> >maybe a loopback filesystem Just what is it that is so enticing about the kernel ? Why not simply pass it to a daemon ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.