From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 1 20:08:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1426F1065750; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA92B8FC1A; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:08:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from gate.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.123] helo=h30.sp.ipt.ru) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1MM66L-000IWc-FG; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:08:17 +0400 To: "Sam Fourman Jr." References: <20090627143719.GA28318@triton.kn-bremen.de> <33059629@ipt.ru> <20090627213533.GA46429@triton.kn-bremen.de> <88413085@ipt.ru> <20090628082701.GA34665@triton.kn-bremen.de> <56244219@ipt.ru> <20090628141008.GA3841@triton.kn-bremen.de> <747dc8f30906290434y77f11bf1i5911ea1efe29fab5@mail.gmail.com> <11167f520907011130u744a36a3m71ee5d125c69f446@mail.gmail.com> <57964197_-_@h30.sp.ipt.ru> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:08:16 +0400 In-Reply-To: <57964197_-_@h30.sp.ipt.ru> (Boris Samorodov's message of "Thu\, 02 Jul 2009 00\:02\:34 +0400") Message-ID: <91883855@h30.sp.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Juergen Lock Subject: Re: flash10 vs f10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:08:19 -0000 On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:02:34 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > Here is a patch to test: Sorry, was stupid of me. Peter Jeremy is right -- it was just a repocopy and the port is not committed yet. I spoke too soon. WBR -- bsam