From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 10:12:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340F616A4CE; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:12:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3D343D3F; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:12:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (acs-24-154-235-164.zoominternet.net [24.154.235.164]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2IICKex044562 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:12:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:12:38 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20040318131238.12142bf1@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040318172827.GB41559@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200403122136.i2CLaCm9096276@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040315033213.GA40858@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040315180324.0fa39609@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20040318002208.GC2541@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040318162358.3f57aef3@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20040318172827.GB41559@dragon.nuxi.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.9claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Alexander Leidinger cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Tom Rhodes Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.cpu.mk bsd.dep.mk bsd.lib.mk bsd.sys.mk src/sys/conf files kern.mk kern.pre.mk kmod.mk src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aicasm Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:12:27 -0000 On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:28:27 -0800 "David O'Brien" wrote: > > Just to be clear -- I'm not against supporting a 2nd compiler in /usr/src Then why voice any opinion at all? > at all. Just don't think Intel is the most gracious compiler vendor. Oh, because you don't like Intel? I agree that they're greedy, but that shouldn't really ... > I'll also strongly push back on ever using 'icc' as part of the release > build. push back a release build. Are you worried that the 'rumors?' of better, more optimized binaries going to hurt the AMD effort? -- Tom Rhodes