From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Jan 30 20:19:35 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA29448 for emulation-outgoing; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 20:19:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA29438 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 20:19:29 -0800 (PST) Received: (from msmith@localhost) by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.2/8.7.3) id OAA06431; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 14:49:08 +1030 (CST) From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199701310419.OAA06431@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: doscmd vs ??? In-Reply-To: from "Karl A. Wagner" at "Jan 31, 97 00:04:54 am" To: karl@softronex.com (Karl A. Wagner) Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 14:49:07 +1030 (CST) Cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, jlemon@americantv.com, emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-emulation@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Karl A. Wagner stands accused of saying: > > Is doscmd a character based program or does it neet to run under X?. I am > interested in running it on dumb terminals ( Wyse, etc. ) so if anyone > can give me a hint i'd appreciate it. Thanks. Both, although currently the tty-mode fullscreen support is poor (this is an issue on which work is being done). The current pcemu prerelease also provides a tty interface for fullscreen DOS programs, if performance is not critical. > Karl A. Wagner -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[