From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Oct 17 15:34:32 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from traven.uol.com.br (traven.uol.com.br [200.231.206.184])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71B937B401
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 200.181.49.108 ([200.181.49.108])
	by traven.uol.com.br (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA25326
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 20:26:22 -0200 (BRST)
Received: (qmail 69687 invoked by uid 1001); 17 Oct 2001 22:34:12 -0000
From: "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" <lioux@uol.com.br>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 20:33:50 -0200
To: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net>
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/30856: Updated port: mail/elm+ME - 2.4ME+94 (patchlevel c)
Message-ID: <20011017203350.A69501@exxodus.fedaykin.here>
References: <200110172112.f9HLCer46810@gits.dyndns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200110172112.f9HLCer46810@gits.dyndns.org>; from clefevre@citeweb.net on Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 11:12:18PM +0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Hi,

	There's only one caveat with the change.
	The ports system will consider this a portrevision upgrade.

$ pkg_version -t 2.4.94.0c 2.4.94c
<

	2.4.94c is a "newer" version when compared to 2.4.94.0c

	Could you hold off this update until patchlevel d is
released? Then, it would not be a problem to change to
2.4.94d since either work

$ pkg_version -t 2.4.94.0c 2.4.94.0d
<

$ pkg_version -t 2.4.94.0c 2.4.94d   
<

	If you absolutely need the update, I'll do it but I'll
place a notice on the logs that the change is aesthethic so
that committers may understand it better. :-)

	Regards,

On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 11:12:18PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
> Hi Mario,
> 
> could you apply the following patch concerning the version naming of
> elm+ME. IMHO, 2.4.94c would be more appropriate than 2.4.94.0c.
> 
> thanks in advance.
> 
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/mail/elm+ME/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.72
> diff -u -r1.72 Makefile
> --- Makefile	2001/10/06 18:19:43	1.72
> +++ Makefile	2001/10/15 22:51:20
> @@ -6,13 +6,9 @@
>  #
>  
>  PORTNAME=	elm+ME
> -PORTVERSION=	2.4.94.0c
> +PORTVERSION=	2.4.94${PATCHLEVEL}
>  CATEGORIES=	mail
> -.if ${PORTVERSION:M*[a-z]} == ""
> -DISTNAME=	${PORTNAME:S/+ME//}-${PORTVERSION:R}ME+${PORTVERSION:E}
> -.else
> -DISTNAME=	${PORTNAME:S/+ME//}-${PORTVERSION:R:R}ME+${PORTVERSION:R:E}
> -.endif
> +DISTNAME=	${PORTNAME:S/+ME//}-${PORTVERSION:R}ME+${PORTVERSION:E:S|${PATCHLEVEL}||}
>  
>  # here are the main repositories.
>  MASTER_SITES=	ftp://ftp.ozone.fmi.fi/KEH/ \
> @@ -32,6 +28,7 @@
>  PATCHFILES=	${DISTNAME:S/+/+PL/}a.patch.gz \
>  		${DISTNAME:S/+/+PL/}b.patch.gz \
>  		${DISTNAME:S/+/+PL/}c.patch.gz
> +PATCHLEVEL=	c
>  PATCH_DIST_STRIP=	-p1
>  
>  MAINTAINER=	clefevre@citeweb.net
> 
> Cyrille.
> -- 
> Cyrille Lefevre                 mailto:clefevre@citeweb.net
> 

-- 
Mario S F Ferreira - UnB - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature."
lioux at ( freebsd dot org | linf dot unb dot br )
flames to beloved devnull@someotherworldbeloworabove.org
feature, n: a documented bug | bug, n: an undocumented feature

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message