From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Apr  1 20:33:44 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6621065673
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun,  1 Apr 2012 20:33:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com)
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com
	[209.85.212.172])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8978FC12
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun,  1 Apr 2012 20:33:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wibhj6 with SMTP id hj6so1681451wib.13
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=CAgePAxCUuw3BDUzUbEV19f/Ozy+f0hsCHNQouIK+tg=;
	b=cXOxgL7QhQ1aJ89bfRBAepBN4eOCRRezNPfmt539d2jNZ5haGIAU+l2HZd6sx7x2FL
	6ufkg94npGYUO7JrUOWcShoYDt+plyezLc0fqGFio9+EtqPjaIVEbH5J9g0v8gtnyAIX
	Wwb7iLsxGBDtPBt6c9bEYMPoUHUOGTUL2nxxUDxZLltFxu1yR2ekUwtHFdy1obp7UrGN
	oG2F0oG9gDFEV5GB3V/dy9RXKk5CAz7mO26v/WIcx2kuwlBs1nDrTr7EHXla1U6s7N6P
	rSHD6PNBoaZNFC6lgsE4AarHKMHpncTA8IcZmam6b8CCWGAVTMIs11eQZq4j7SDIBRfa
	Go3A==
Received: by 10.180.104.230 with SMTP id gh6mr17698563wib.22.1333312423514;
	Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk.
	[87.194.105.247])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o2sm45274174wiv.11.2012.04.01.13.33.41
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 21:33:40 +0100
From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20120401213340.5cea6a29@gumby.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F7827A7.3030804@yandex.ru>
References: <4F7827A7.3030804@yandex.ru>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Preferred way of applying OSVERSION-dependend patches
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:33:44 -0000

On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:02:15 +0400
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:

> 
> Good day!
> 
> What is a preferred way of doing subj?
> 
> 1. Add an extra-patch-* to files/ subdirectory and apply it depending
>     of checks in Makefile (.if ${OSVERSION}).
> 2. Add an patch-* to files subdirectory that applies unconditionally
>     and that checking for __FreeBSD_version in app code itself.
> 
> The second one will guarantee that the patch still applies cleanly on 
> port versions update,

It also works correctly for package files.