From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 13 23:36:22 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id XAA02849 for current-outgoing; Mon, 13 Mar 1995 23:36:22 -0800 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA02843 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 1995 23:36:20 -0800 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id XAA09518; Mon, 13 Mar 1995 23:36:16 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id XAA00670; Mon, 13 Mar 1995 23:36:16 -0800 Message-Id: <199503140736.XAA00670@corbin.Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: corbin.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Brian Tao cc: FreeBSD-current users Subject: Re: Things are looking up :-) In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Mar 95 15:23:03 +0800." From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Mon, 13 Mar 1995 23:36:16 -0800 Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >On Mon, 13 Mar 1995, David Greenman wrote: >> > >> > Is there a noticeable difference between 8% and 10% minfree? >> >> No, not one that I've ever seen. > > Okay.. I was wondering if the original message was advocating >everyone to reduce their minfree from 10% to 8% for some astounding >performance gain. :) The default minfree for 2.0 was 5%. I'm asking people to increase it to 8% because of problems with using 5%. -DG