From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 12 01:38:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAF6C75 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 01:38:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCB38FC0C for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 01:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAC1cWR3062532 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:38:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <50A05318.8050300@rawbw.com> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:38:32 -0800 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121107 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Should all known devices be added to usbdevs? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 01:38:33 -0000 I see that many storage and network devices aren't in usbdevs. graphics/libgphoto2 package actually has more complete list. But it looks like they only process PTP/MTP storage interfaces. Should we add to usbdevs missing devices from the list in graphics/libgphoto2? For ex. I am looking at smartphone, it has MTP USB storage interface recognized by gphoto2, but FreeBSD also recognizes the umodem device, and this smartphone isn't in the list. Yuri