From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 22:03:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40C9BA8C for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 22:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D162D2D35 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 22:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id f8so4931454wiw.2 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 15:03:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lR/anpKj/DGpUeGqYMtl14GsU5m270CP+zGdgRszmRQ=; b=TPFJbbp1AI3SAJU7uFgZqR0eo05fy/30yPqSeVo19g3wLyaYCF+BW1sKqm44rBd6/C Kwnq8t2K2ApCoE+Hz/G1KYu9x8IpAyIPDNOKnFCxJP1oJfgrNxS/ZWe+9AJA0jmHyRja Ebjjdvc4t82D4Ok7frmcS/eTk9TOXlxfamB2pEd4cXENrj0mwaHFOQpyqXg5spyQ5+6p S4ifChwQf2HERgC7ejm9RrYxJC3GZ+iaNjX0ly8B2TlR2F0TkbyEJnIs0qC6KHd4i8l2 Q4u+ic2pp/3TkvYZrLFYEsB9k2xBvLTBwr5Q9VQyNkYmk1XJeXrWPjqA9yxaP+eEtr+N YGYg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.211.239 with SMTP id nf15mr905330wic.9.1400537031195; Mon, 19 May 2014 15:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.43.194 with HTTP; Mon, 19 May 2014 15:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: David.I.Noel@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <537A704D.6010209@gmail.com> References: <537A704D.6010209@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 17:03:51 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: MITM attacks against portsnap and freebsd-update From: David Noel To: Alnis Morics Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 22:03:53 -0000 On 5/19/14, Alnis Morics wrote: > On 05/19/2014 23:28, David Noel wrote: >> I also think it would be an appropriate time to discuss retiring >> portsnap. > Subversion checkouts and updates take much more time than Porstnap. My experience has been that both portsnap and svn update typically take under a minute to complete. Regardless, don't most people run this in the background with portsnap cron?