From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Apr 6 21:37:52 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA20115 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 21:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA20081 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 21:37:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.virginia.edu (mail.Virginia.EDU [128.143.2.9]) by who.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.11) with SMTP id OAA26429 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 14:52:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cs.virginia.edu by mail.virginia.edu id aa28423; 6 Apr 97 17:50 EDT Received: from stretch.cs.Virginia.edu (atf3r@stretch-fo.cs.Virginia.EDU [128.143.136.14]) by archive.cs.Virginia.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA01068; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 17:50:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by stretch.cs.Virginia.edu (4.1/SMI-2.0) id AA27869; Sun, 6 Apr 97 17:50:52 EDT Date: Sun, 6 Apr 1997 17:50:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Adrian T. Filipi-Martin" Reply-To: adrian@virginia.edu To: ee96199@tom.fe.up.pt Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux vs freebsd testimonial In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 4 Apr 1997 ee96199@tom.fe.up.pt wrote: > Linux 2.0.18 (generic kernel from RedHat Linux 4.0)........ 10.5 > FreeBSD 2.2.1 (generic kernel)............................. 12.9 > FreeBSD 2.1.5 ('personalized' kernel)...................... 6.8 What customizations did you apply? Which ones do you suspect gave you the biggest boost? Was it just removal of unnecessary drivers? My 2.2.1 box is seeming a little slugish from its 2.2-ALPHA incarnation. cheers, Adrian -- adrian@virginia.edu ---->>>>| Support your local programmer, System Administrator --->>>| STOP Software Patent Abuses NOW! NVL, NIIMS and Telemedicine Labs -->>| For an application and information Member: League for Programming Freedom ->| see: http://www.lpf.org/