From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Mar 29 18:10:50 1996
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA06840
          for stable-outgoing; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 18:10:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from haven.uniserve.com (haven.uniserve.com [198.53.215.121])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA06835
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 18:10:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by haven.uniserve.com id <30780-1154>; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 18:13:31 -0800
Date: 	Fri, 29 Mar 1996 18:13:22 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>
To: Gary Clark II <gclarkii@main.gbdata.com>
cc: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net>, stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Stable as bad with Adaptec as NCR
In-Reply-To: <199603300016.SAA12748@main.gbdata.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960329180108.18975A-100000@haven.uniserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Fri, 29 Mar 1996, Gary Clark II wrote:

> I've also had machines running stable that have 2940s and SC-200s in them
> and they run fine also.  Could it be something else maybe besides the 

  Consider yourself fortunate.  The ahc driver is 2.1 works badly with 
fast controllers (ex 2940), and fast drives.  The ahc driver in -stable 
is better.  There are still problems.  A fix for the "free vnode isnt" 
bug was just committed into stable today which should help.  

Tom