Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:54:00 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Michael Scheidell <scheidell@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/svnmerge Makefile
Message-ID:  <20120208145400.GA33451@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F3289C3.2050203@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201202081353.q18DrNIb053278@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120208141921.GB25593@FreeBSD.org> <4F3289C3.2050203@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:42:11PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> On 2012.02.08. 15:19, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:53:23PM +0000, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> >>>  scheidell    2012-02-08 13:53:23 UTC
> >>>
> >>>     Modified files:
> >>>       devel/svnmerge       Makefile
> >>>     Log:
> >>>     - Bump PORTEPOCH
> >It seems that previous package could not be generated, which means no
> >PORTEPOCH bump is necessary.  You still have some time to revert it before
> >it spreads out to the mirrors (less than an hour).
> He got an erwinmail, which he forwarded to me because svnmerge-1.6.17 <
> svnmerge-1.7.2. So it seems the bump is necessary.

Yes, I understand.  But it seems that after SVN_VERSION was bumped to 1.7
this port become broken, and could not be installed or packaged.  As such,
revision 1.3 of Makefile (switch to devel/subversion16) could be treated as
regular unbreak, without the need for PORTEPOCH bump.

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120208145400.GA33451>