From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 8 14:54:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 462711065673; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:54:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:54:00 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Gabor Kovesdan Message-ID: <20120208145400.GA33451@FreeBSD.org> References: <201202081353.q18DrNIb053278@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120208141921.GB25593@FreeBSD.org> <4F3289C3.2050203@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F3289C3.2050203@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Michael Scheidell , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/svnmerge Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:54:00 -0000 On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:42:11PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > On 2012.02.08. 15:19, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:53:23PM +0000, Michael Scheidell wrote: > >>> scheidell 2012-02-08 13:53:23 UTC > >>> > >>> Modified files: > >>> devel/svnmerge Makefile > >>> Log: > >>> - Bump PORTEPOCH > >It seems that previous package could not be generated, which means no > >PORTEPOCH bump is necessary. You still have some time to revert it before > >it spreads out to the mirrors (less than an hour). > He got an erwinmail, which he forwarded to me because svnmerge-1.6.17 < > svnmerge-1.7.2. So it seems the bump is necessary. Yes, I understand. But it seems that after SVN_VERSION was bumped to 1.7 this port become broken, and could not be installed or packaged. As such, revision 1.3 of Makefile (switch to devel/subversion16) could be treated as regular unbreak, without the need for PORTEPOCH bump. ./danfe