From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 14 05:47:51 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749BF16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 14 May 2004 05:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752C443D41
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 14 May 2004 05:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro)
Received: (qmail 6918 invoked by uid 89); 14 May 2004 12:41:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.131)
  by 0 with SMTP; 14 May 2004 12:41:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 445 invoked from network); 14 May 2004 12:47:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19)
  by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 14 May 2004 12:47:49 -0000
Received: from it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro
	[192.168.0.10])
	by buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id F163A613C
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 14 May 2004 15:47:37 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.buh.cameradicommercio.ro [127.0.0.1])
	by it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1987A23
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 14 May 2004 15:51:57 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro ([127.0.0.1])port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 72842-08 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 14 May 2004 15:51:56 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (localhost.buh.cameradicommercio.ro
	[127.0.0.1])
	by it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A9401E
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 14 May 2004 15:51:53 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 15:51:52 +0300
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-Id: <20040514155152.4d6dee6b@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
In-Reply-To: <40A3F1D5.5010209@bellsouth.net>
References: <40A3F1D5.5010209@bellsouth.net>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro
Subject: but withoutI WITNESS and INVARIANTS ? (was: Re: General -CURRENT
 status)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 12:47:51 -0000

On Thu, 13 May 2004 17:08:21 -0500
Nilson <nilson@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> I was wondering about the general status of the -CURRENT branch - is it 
> horribly broken, or usable?
> 
> I am wanting to bring my server back up to the latest -CURRENT (I last 
> built a kernel and world about a month ago)

How safe is it to run it without WITNESS and INVARIANTS ?

My -CURRENT are pretty stable an I was wondering if they would do OK
without: INVARIANTS, INVARIANT_SUPPORT and WITNESS.


-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"