From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 18 15:35:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28D937BB90; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:35:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id PAA25985; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:35:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:35:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: James Howard Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shell games In-Reply-To: <200004181556.LAA25843@rac2.wam.umd.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, James Howard wrote: > I don't get a lot of time to pay attention to the lists, so this might > have been asked before. Does the csh->tcsh move imply that sh->ksh will > be happening soon? Didn't NetBSD do that a while ago? No, it doesn't automatically mean that. The csh->tcsh update was a version upgrade (tcsh is a newer version of csh), which is a separate issue to replacing a shell with a completely different shell. There has been annoying discussion on -arch about this which you should read before replying further, though. Kris ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message