From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 10:30:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721F31065693 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A0C8FC08 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Mn8ot-0007Dz-N2 for freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:30:03 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:30:03 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:30:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:25:28 +0200 Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090817) In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: New Virtualbox port (from today) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:30:06 -0000 Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > On Fri, September 11, 2009 11:07, Ivan Voras wrote: >> Hi, >> >> VirtualBox now works with VT and I'm able to run SMP guests! >> >> But apparently it's not very stable (got two boot crashes) and something >> is wrong with timers: > > in my testes, I never got so far as a boot when using any 8.x > >> Example 1: host HZ=250, guest HZ=1000, - guest time apparently speeds up >> more than it should >> >> Example 2: same host, guest HZ=100 - guest time apparently goes 5x >> slower than real (wall) time. >> >> Example 3: same host, guest HZ=25, guest time apparently 2x slower than >> real (wall) time. >> >> In the examples, host is amd64 8-BETA2, 4CPU, guest is 7.2-RELEASE i386, >> 2CPU. > > I tried on a quite close system. intel or amd yours ? Intel. > maybe its time to try again. my system was built from scratch. any > particular tip ? No, nothing unusual or specially configured, except HZ.