From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jul 5 15:18:49 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA15755 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 5 Jul 1996 15:18:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA15746; Fri, 5 Jul 1996 15:18:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA15685; Fri, 5 Jul 1996 15:15:31 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199607052215.PAA15685@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: SysAdmin Tools - ideas wanted To: kelly@fsl.noaa.gov (Sean Kelly) Date: Fri, 5 Jul 1996 15:15:31 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG, ron@infi.net, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199607052159.VAA03846@gatekeeper.fsl.noaa.gov> from "Sean Kelly" at Jul 5, 96 03:59:53 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Terry> Tcl/tk are OK for the fornt end tool, but not the backend > Terry> implementation. > > But it'd be perfect for providing an *interface* to the backend > implementation. That's one of Tcl's strongest features: it's easily > embeddable---and you get a set of nice scripting primitives as a > bonus. Keep the scripting away from the tools proper, please. I don't want to *have* to run Tcl to administer my system, but I can understand that other people may want to run it to administer theirs. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.