From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jan 30 12: 5: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1920151BD for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2000 12:05:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@research.att.com) Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3234CE0E; Sun, 30 Jan 2000 15:04:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46]) by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA26234; Sun, 30 Jan 2000 15:04:59 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fenner Received: (from fenner@localhost) by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id MAA09521; Sun, 30 Jan 2000 12:04:58 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200001302004.MAA09521@windsor.research.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: alex@big.endian.de Subject: Re: ports/16444: fix games/maelstrom (bentofied) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 12:04:57 -0800 Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.2g/makemail 2.9a Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > In fact, I've read so much code with socklen_t, that I thought it is > the standard :-P (Steven's books as a small example) It *is* the standard... now. The standard just happens to be different from the original socket interface, and the fact that g++ has -pedantic-errors on by default means that you can't write portable code. (You can't even AC_CHECK_TYPE() since it's in , you'd have to use AC_EGREP_HEADER() or AC_TRY_COMPILE()...). I've found that the easiest thing to do with ports is to just compile with -pedantic. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message