Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:34:20 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Completely unscientific poll: cfengine, puppet, other? Message-ID: <20160229183419.GS497@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <20160229083446.65cb479f@mephala> References: <CAG_PEey4TR%2BZo=bq24HCmShYV1FZJpBiPAeegF5455oUjER5pg@mail.gmail.com> <20160229083446.65cb479f@mephala>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:34:46AM +0100 I heard the voice of Marko Cupać, and lo! it spake thus: > On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:11:36 -0500 > Chris Inacio <nacho319@gmail.com> wrote: > > Happy if you would just reply with which one, if any, you use. > > For my relatively simple task of occasional push of identical > configuration files to dozens of jails I use salt. I'm also using salt somewhat lightly for a bunch of jails. I'm using it mostly for the incidentals rather than core (e.g., one jail is a mail server; salt doesn't touch the config. But others need null-client type mail configs; salt does those). It has its... quirks, but I'm still using it, so I guess that means it beats doing everything manually. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160229183419.GS497>