From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 14 22:39:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D255106564A; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:39:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (cl-414.sto-01.se.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:16d8:ff00:19d::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB0C8FC08; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (207.47.0.2.static.nextweb.net [207.47.0.2]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8529F8FC4E; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 02:39:13 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 19A776B47; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:39:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:39:24 -0700 From: Stanislav Sedov To: Wesley Shields Message-Id: <20101014153924.b290bd11.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20101014215117.GB34544@atarininja.org> References: <201010122319.o9CNJD1A046613@repoman.freebsd.org> <20101014131456.4d49bd3d.stas@FreeBSD.org> <20101014215117.GB34544@atarininja.org> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Steve Wills , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/rubygem-pkg-config pkg-descr X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:39:17 -0000 On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:51:17 -0400 Wesley Shields mentioned: > In all honesty, your insistence on not using 'co-mentor' is the first > I've ever heard of it. I realize that doesn't make it right, but I think > my point that this is a silly debate still stands. But you didn't heard that you should use 'co-mentor' either? It was meant for consistency, so you can later do some automatic processing based on "(mentor)". I don't even know where this string came from: you probably can't find any references to "approved by co-mentor" neither in the committer's guide, or in porter's handbook. I just was surpised to receive no reaction on my first comment both from the committer and the mentor: the "co-mentor" nonsense has continued to be used. Maybe I just missed that, but I didn't heard that we allow each new mentor to invent his own string to put into parenthesis; if it's true, my I'll ask my next mentee to put something like "master" or "god" in place of "mentor", just because I like it better, or nobody told me that I shouldn't do that. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE