From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Sep 20 1:51: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from hromeo.algonet.se (hromeo.algonet.se [194.213.74.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEF2514E1F for ; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 01:50:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mal@algonet.se) Received: (qmail 15115 invoked from network); 20 Sep 1999 10:50:56 +0200 Received: from enok.algonet.se (194.213.74.88) by hromeo.algonet.se with SMTP; 20 Sep 1999 10:50:56 +0200 Received: from kairos.algonet.se ([194.213.74.18]) by algonet.se (BLUETAIL Mail Robustifier1.0.4) with ESMTP ; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 08:50:55 GMT Received: (mal@localhost) by kairos.algonet.se (8.8.8+Sun/8.6.12) id KAA16875; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 10:50:54 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 10:50:54 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <199909200850.KAA16875@kairos.algonet.se> X-Authentication-Warning: kairos.algonet.se: mal set sender to mal@kairos.algonet.se using -f From: Mats Lofkvist To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GNU GLOBAL References: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Shigio Yamaguchi wrote: > It seems that you misunderstand. > Current GLOBAL(3.53 and earlier) is BSD-style licensed and it is true for ever. > I agree with the plan to make a ports of GNU/GLOBAL in the future. > But you need not remove BSD/GLOBAL from source tree. But bugfixes and/or developments needed by the core FreeBSD tools will have to be done on the BSD licensed version of global (since the core system isn't supposed to depend on ports), isn't this going to lead to the split of the global development in two? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message