From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 06:30:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457C316A4CE; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 06:30:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from matrix.gatewaynet.com (matrix.gatewaynet.com [217.19.69.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9F543D46; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 06:30:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from matrix.gatewaynet.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by matrix.gatewaynet.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7U5hZsR028746; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:43:35 +0300 Received: from localhost (achill@localhost)i7U5hZQk028742; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:43:35 +0300 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:43:35 +0300 (EEST) From: Achilleus Mantzios To: Tim Robbins In-Reply-To: <20040829120406.GA52614@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:38:41 +0000 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Transition from 5.1-RELEASE-p10 to 5.3-BETA2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 06:30:26 -0000 O kyrios Tim Robbins egrapse stis Aug 29, 2004 : > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 09:58:41AM +0300, Achilleus Mantzios wrote: > > Hi, after make buildworld,make buildkernel, make install kernel > > i rebooted single-user, just to find out that > > ls, mount, etc.. gave > > ls exited with signal 12, > > bad system call. > > > > After i rebooted with the old 5.1 kernel and did make buildkernel > > *with* COMPAT_FREEBSD4, i could reboot single user with > > 5.3 and run ls,mount, etc... just fine. > > This was covered by the 20031112 entry in /usr/src/UPDATING. As a general > rule, you should use GENERIC instead of a custom kernel configuration (or a > GENERIC config from a previous release) when updating, at least on branches > that aren't marked -STABLE. > > > What has COMPAT_FREEBSD4 has to do, since i *didnt* have it in my > > 5.1-RELEASE-p10, and no FreeBSD 4.x programs were run? > > I believe the rationale was that no -STABLE releases after FreeBSD 4 > used the old statfs() interface. I agree that the name is misleading. > Thanx. > > Tim > -- -Achilleus