From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 11:22:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B9D1065674 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:22:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F198FC1E for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:22:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so10758699rvf.43 for ; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:22:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received:date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ixPPGnX3cfHBpEmsr95rrkvtGbyXxL2+NY4QAMo5hIY=; b=cy+ECf53sVmkjLFeAwyDTge4xwcW7ymVR6dDWWYK9+clSgAreDXdBkWqElO00FC3Oz EhaaeZw5VREqfiDyX23cG17uLz3SR6hs8pBR31hiY6R1nTxPqIYPU44OnUKAugoDkSAO 9EHxIt79kKTPpyIpZXauT90d1qFtnXf81IKcg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=D/9NKNX9uoMQ08j1cR0iMfdFHfVNlNlbHmR8DxdnVbO508z0ZEBwoVK7FFoHo0Ux5r zKwFWW7QPhm7Z+EILXosl7h+/5sY7i8cnxwWHcCPFMr3R5/mYZ+GNhRuWXJ7pB3+T9T3 NgFNYV3CofCnddJmHA8Du5EfTutl3RKNlN/2s= Received: by 10.141.162.9 with SMTP id p9mr12676557rvo.202.1231500177590; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:22:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ([211.53.35.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g14sm878184rvb.0.2009.01.09.03.22.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:22:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n09BMlsJ035820 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:22:47 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n09BMkuC035819; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:22:46 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:22:46 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: Barbara Message-ID: <20090109112246.GI30747@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <28973184.939641231151814355.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <28973184.939641231151814355.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Lock enabling onboard lan (Attansic L1 GbE) on 7.1-PRERELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:22:58 -0000 On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:36:54AM +0100, Barbara wrote: [...] > I've tried all the thing you've suggested with > the same result. > I've disabled "LAN Option ROM", but it seems that I don't have > the other options you mentioned. > I've downloaded and burned the 7.1-RELEASE dvd > and tried to boot from it, but it hangs at the same point. > Finally I've tried > booting a CURRENT snapshot cd (8.0-CURRENT-200812) and I was able to properly > configure the device in sysinstall. > Any idea about the problem? No, there is no source code differences between CURRENT and 7.1-RELEASE. > I've installed > from 7.0 and I have another NIC, but being now age in GENERIC, I hope it will > not cause troubles to other people installing for the first time. > Anyway thank > you for now, and ask me if there is something that I can do to fix the problem > like more tests, patches, etc. > Would try the following WIP version? http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/age/if_age.c http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/age/if_agereg.h I have no longer access to L1 hardware so I don't know whether it helps or not. -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon