From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri May  2 02:02:06 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA21428
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 2 May 1997 02:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA21422;
          Fri, 2 May 1997 02:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (localhost.lan.awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1])
	by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA16816;
	Fri, 2 May 1997 09:48:49 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <199705020848.JAA16816@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@FreeBSD.ORG>
cc: dgy@rtd.com (Don Yuniskis), chuckr@mat.net, FreeBSD-Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG,
        jmb@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SPAM target 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 01 May 1997 17:26:34 PDT."
             <199705020026.RAA28682@hub.freebsd.org> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 09:48:49 +0100
From: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > (sigh)  I've asked previously why each list doesn't require
> > the originators of posts to also subscribe to the list (and received
> > sensible answers).  Perhaps it might be time to start changing that
> > policy??
> 
> 	yes, that would stop some of the bozos,
> 	others would learn hwo to perform the obvious manuever.

As long as exceptions are allowed.  I post messages as
brian@awfulhak.org and brian@utell.co.uk, but the mailing
list subscription is brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk.....

> jmb

-- 
Brian <brian@awfulhak.org>, <brian@freebsd.org>
      <http://www.awfulhak.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....