Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:11:28 -0800
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/59254: ports that write something after bsd.port.mk
Message-ID:  <20031114011128.GA38924@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <3FB40710.8010409@fillmore-labs.com>
References:  <3FB39FB5.5000209@fillmore-labs.com> <20031113164741.GA33494@dragon.nuxi.com> <3FB40710.8010409@fillmore-labs.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:34:56PM +0100, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> You are right with CONFIGURE_TARGET, 359 ports use a workaround, thanks
> again for bringing this up. I'm using this workaround myself in the
> OpenLDAP ports, and PR 52917 seems to deal with it. At least it should
> be easy to remove the workaround from those ports, they all use the
> same assignment, so it's just a simple search-and-replace.

Maybe we need a knob (USE_NEW_CONFIGURE_TUPLE) or something so that
there is complete consistency in the GNU tuple string.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031114011128.GA38924>