From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 21:54:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2403116A4DA for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from mail.kuban.ru (mail.kuban.ru [62.183.66.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA18943D58 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:54:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru ([83.239.48.142]) by mail.kuban.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id k7KLre7D000966; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 01:53:50 +0400 (MSD) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GEvDR-0000BF-HT; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 01:52:21 +0400 To: Divacky Roman References: <1156096970.19717.12.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> <20060820204338.GA76869@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 01:52:21 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20060820204338.GA76869@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> (Divacky Roman's message of "Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:43:39 +0200") Message-ID: <14630010@bsam.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Boris Samorodov Cc: Paul Mather , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linuxulator: syscall statfs64 not implemented? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:54:03 -0000 On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:43:39 +0200 Divacky Roman wrote: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:02:50PM -0400, Paul Mather wrote: > > Since updating my -CURRENT system circa 16th August I'm getting an error > > like this when my daily Tivoli backup runs: > > > > Aug 20 02:18:50 zappa kernel: linux: pid 768 (dsmc): syscall statfs64 not implemented > > > > I don't know whether this is a -CURRENT problem or a problem with > > linux_base-fc4, but I lean towards the former because the same nightly > > backup setup I'm running on a 6.1-STABLE system runs without problems. > > > > I recall a discussion about merging Linux 2.6 kernel support into HEAD > > around the time I updated. Could this be related to that? Here is what > > I have for my Linux compat sysctls: > > > > compat.linux.oss_version: 198144 > > compat.linux.osrelease: 2.4.2 > > compat.linux.osname: Linux > > > > Is anyone else having this "syscall statfs64 not implemented" problem? > yes, everyone. statfs64 syscalls is not implemented. > I might implement if its important and you are willing to test. it should be > quite trivial but I need the testing. I can test it at -CURRENT amd64. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve