Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 01:52:21 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> Cc: Paul Mather <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linuxulator: syscall statfs64 not implemented? Message-ID: <14630010@bsam.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060820204338.GA76869@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> (Divacky Roman's message of "Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:43:39 %2B0200") References: <1156096970.19717.12.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> <20060820204338.GA76869@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:43:39 +0200 Divacky Roman wrote: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:02:50PM -0400, Paul Mather wrote: > > Since updating my -CURRENT system circa 16th August I'm getting an error > > like this when my daily Tivoli backup runs: > > > > Aug 20 02:18:50 zappa kernel: linux: pid 768 (dsmc): syscall statfs64 not implemented > > > > I don't know whether this is a -CURRENT problem or a problem with > > linux_base-fc4, but I lean towards the former because the same nightly > > backup setup I'm running on a 6.1-STABLE system runs without problems. > > > > I recall a discussion about merging Linux 2.6 kernel support into HEAD > > around the time I updated. Could this be related to that? Here is what > > I have for my Linux compat sysctls: > > > > compat.linux.oss_version: 198144 > > compat.linux.osrelease: 2.4.2 > > compat.linux.osname: Linux > > > > Is anyone else having this "syscall statfs64 not implemented" problem? > yes, everyone. statfs64 syscalls is not implemented. > I might implement if its important and you are willing to test. it should be > quite trivial but I need the testing. I can test it at -CURRENT amd64. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14630010>