From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 2 14:40:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D31106567E for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 14:40:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161CB8FC13 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 14:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p42EeGVU062337 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 14:40:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p42EeGk6062336; Mon, 2 May 2011 14:40:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 14:40:16 GMT Message-Id: <201105021440.p42EeGk6062336@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: John Baldwin Cc: Subject: Re: kern/147583: [puc] [patch] sys/dev/puc/pucdata.c: incorrect clock value for Oxford OX16PCI954 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Baldwin List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 14:40:17 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/147583; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: Craig Leres Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/147583: [puc] [patch] sys/dev/puc/pucdata.c: incorrect clock value for Oxford OX16PCI954 Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 10:27:24 -0400 On Friday, April 29, 2011 4:53:05 pm Craig Leres wrote: > On 04/28/11 12:29, John Baldwin wrote: > > Please try this patch and see if it allows your device to work: > > Hum... I was running 7.2-RELEASE last summer when I posted the PR. Since > then I've switched to 8.2-RELEASE and stopped using the cards. My kernel > was built from 8-RELENG yesterday. > > Today I dusted off one of the cards and I installed it but the driver > does not create any /dev entries with or without the patch. It does id > the card > > I've attached pciconf -lv output from kernels with and without the patch > along with my kernel config and messages from one of the bootups with > the patch applied. Hopefully it's obvious what I'm doing wrong. Hmm, what does 'devinfo -rv' show? -- John Baldwin