From owner-freebsd-chat Wed May 10 8:32:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3C437B838 for ; Wed, 10 May 2000 08:32:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA02870; Wed, 10 May 2000 09:32:32 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20000510093056.04315d90@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 09:32:26 -0600 To: Arun Sharma , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: IA64 BIOS/EFI uses FreeBSD libc In-Reply-To: <20000509211847.A5939@sharmas.dhs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 10:18 PM 5/9/2000, Arun Sharma wrote: >ftp://download.intel.com/technology/efi/idf_toolkit_slides.pdf Yes, it makes good sense that they're using BSD-licensed code. If they didn't, manufacturers would complain (justifiably!) that they couldn't add unique value. And I don't think that Intel wants its code to be controlled by the likes of Richard Stallman. --Brett "I yam Popeye of Borg. Prepares to be askimilgrated." -- Source unknown To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message