Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:02:08 +0100
From:      Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
To:        Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@interface-systems.de>
Cc:        Olivier Cherrier <oc@symacx.com>
Subject:   Re: Onboard SCSI controller support on Ultra 2
Message-ID:  <20050216140208.A6222@newtrinity.zeist.de>
In-Reply-To: <20050216121647.GB91200@ida.interface-business.de>; from j@ida.interface-business.de on Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 01:16:47PM %2B0100
References:  <a9fd2434258a08bc12f47247a253f1b4@symacx.com> <86a92e307b2dd4a18e91120078ad0f11@symacx.com> <a9fd2434258a08bc12f47247a253f1b4@symacx.com> <86a92e307b2dd4a18e91120078ad0f11@symacx.com> <20050216121647.GB91200@ida.interface-business.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 01:16:47PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> As Olivier Cherrier wrote:
> 
> 
> Btw., the 3500/4500 are still mentioned as having no support for their
> Sbus-based SCSI (fibrechannel) controller.  ISTR someone recently

AFAIK the on-board SCSI controller is a FAS366 which is supported by
esp(4). Fibrechannel SBus-based controllers _might_ be supported by
isp(4).

> wrote the SCSI controller does work though, can I take this for
> granted and update the file as well?  I should get access to a 3500
> sometime soon, but so far cannot verify it.

That would be great. With the switch to uart(4) as the default console
in GENERIC there currently is no console support for these machines.
Marcel probably will commit a hack to puc(4) soon to make the Z8530 on
the FireHose bus work. Ideally fhc(4) should be fixed so this hack
isn't required but so far I didn't manage to get access to an E[3-5]000
series machines to test the required changes. Could you please let me
know when you got access to that E3500?

> 
> > > The prob i did find was with QFE card support; they all appear as
> > > hme, have the correct individual MAC addresses--- but little else,
> > > and errors galore.
> 
> The QFE actually *is* a quad HME card, that's why FreeBSD uses the
> same driver for it.  What kind of problems do you have with it?
> 
> I've only used PCI-based QFEs so far, but never encountered any
> problems with them -- they even make a fine Quad card in IA32 machines
> now that FreeBSD supports them outside of OpenFirmware systems.
> 

AFAIK the SBus QFE cards only have a single interrupt for all four
HMEs and the FreeBSD hme(4) doesn't take this into account.

Marius



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050216140208.A6222>