From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep  2 08:33:07 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB85F16A4CE
	for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  2 Sep 2004 08:33:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mailman1.servecentric.com (mailman1.servecentric.com
	[212.147.131.3])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBCC43D39
	for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  2 Sep 2004 08:33:07 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from imencke@servecentric.com)
Received: from sun (unknown [212.147.132.69])
	by mailman1.servecentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CD448234DD; Thu,  2 Sep 2004 09:33:05 +0100 (IST)
From: Ivo Mencke <imencke@servecentric.com>
To: SG <essgee@secure.xohost.com>
In-Reply-To: <002601c490c5$6a44b020$9301010a@SLEEK>
References: <002601c490c5$6a44b020$9301010a@SLEEK>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: servecentric.com
Message-Id: <1094113934.18992.322.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:32:14 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bind/Netra t1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: imencke@servecentric.com
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 08:33:07 -0000

We run a very similar setup here (except we use E220's) and its been
working perfectly for over 6 months. 

On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 09:18, SG wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone was experiencing any issues running bind 9.2.3 in 
> chroot with fbsd 5.2.1, netra t105 512 ram. The problems I'm having is that 
> the named process will use a lot of cpu at times 30%-90% but will normally 
> run at 10%, and the memory usage will steadily increase over time until it 
> starts eating into swap. The same configuration on a p3 1ghz with the same 
> amount of ram will run flawlessly and use no more than 150 meg. The amount 
> of domains this server is authoritative for is relatively small, a little 
> over 200 and at peak will only do about 150 recursive queries per second. 
> Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> Regards,
> Andrew 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"