From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 28 14:09:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C0E106564A; Fri, 28 May 2010 14:09:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:679::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A744B8FC16; Fri, 28 May 2010 14:09:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DBCC400F; Fri, 28 May 2010 14:09:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on muon.cran.org.uk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Received: from [192.168.1.140] (87-194-158-129.bethere.co.uk [87.194.158.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 28 May 2010 14:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BFFCE8F.9090409@cran.org.uk> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 15:09:19 +0100 From: Bruce Cran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Chadwick References: <060401cafe37$a411b240$ec3516c0$@net> <4BFF894F.4010008@icyb.net.ua> <20100528134549.GA75411@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20100528134549.GA75411@icarus.home.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.1-Prerelease Panic amd64 w/ZFS.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:09:34 -0000 On 28/05/2010 14:45, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > It is? On amd64, vm.kmem_size (not vm.kmem_size_max) is what has to be > increased. I can point folks to the "official" statement from pjd@ and > some others if need be. For a very long time I questioned this because > for an even longer amount of time we were being told to increase > vm.kmem_size_max. > It seems the wiki should probably be updated - it still says 8.0 and 9-CURRENT shouldn't require tuning - http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide says: "FreeBSD 7.2+ has improved kernel memory allocation strategy and no tuning may be necessary on systems with more than 2 GB of RAM." -- Bruce Cran