From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 29 07:28:38 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BAF17D150 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 07:28:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 472NVY3L7Hz4Bq9 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 07:28:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x9T7SPPn088160 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:28:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfence.it; s=201911; t=1572334107; bh=WiBR2NS9KBqpjd5EdqMD6agkI4sOZ5I4bTrdwnsiSII=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=B3U6OfVDhvHVd3lrph08l+DBeSOXW0gB5xVNNg3qH9elgIwvd/QRW45ArOpwccD10 Q3NKBESajDVEjxDiGqqcWrWPC7ENT4+MQL54wv0wF3P7Bjg1XP3GLOh5w12ez4ikUa GB42Vw6nE/zbs7yfjgBlIdZ7RcTxOhuBdV2IW61U= X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: Two or more exports files, is it feasible? To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <201910290258.x9T2wo0Y061307@soth.netfence.it> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <7f437740-df2a-c654-de05-2b8cab73ba20@netfence.it> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:28:25 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201910290258.x9T2wo0Y061307@soth.netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 472NVY3L7Hz4Bq9 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=netfence.it header.s=201911 header.b=B3U6OfVD; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.46 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[netfence.it:s=201911]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netfence.it:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; IP_SCORE(-1.96)[ip: (-6.41), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(-3.20), asn: 30722(-0.22), country: IT(0.03)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 07:28:38 -0000 On 2019-10-29 03:57, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Is is possible to have two or more /etc/exports files, using different names of course? While I cannot answer your question... > One possible scenario is having one exports file for NFS 4 and one for NFS3, for clients that don't support NFS 4? ... I used to have both NFSv3 and NFSv4 exports in the same file, back before I completely got rid of NFSv3. Are you having problems doing this? bye av.