From owner-cvs-all  Tue Jan 29  8:44:44 2002
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.wrs.com (unknown-1-11.windriver.com [147.11.1.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0016137B416; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:44:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from windriver.com ([128.224.195.173])
	by mail.wrs.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA06523;
	Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:41:54 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3C56D123.B8694352@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:43:15 -0500
From: Tadayuki OKADA <tadayuki.okada@windriver.com>
Organization: Wind River
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79C-ja  [ja_JP.EUC] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i386)
X-Accept-Language: ja, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Akinori MUSHA <knu@iDaemons.org>
Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.cc>, Clive Lin <clive@tongi.org>,
	cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/chinese/mutt Makefile distinfo
References: <200201281806.g0SI6U989949@freefall.freebsd.org>
		<20020128181626.GA91155@malloc.eb.kliev.net>
		<20020128220136.GE49984@squall.waterspout.com>
		<20020129094005.GA11322@malloc.eb.kliev.net>
		<864rl5cwh5.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
		<20020129134125.GB47169@madman.nectar.cc> <86vgdlb2td.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
> 
> At Tue, 29 Jan 2002 07:41:25 -0600,
> Jacques A. Vidrine <n@nectar.cc> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 06:55:34PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
> > > What about doing like this:
> > >
> > >     master:
> > >
> > >     PORTREVISION?=  0       # master port's revision
> >
> > Isn't this redundant (it is already in bsd.port.mk)?
> >
> > >     slave:
> > >
> > >     PORTREVISION=   1       # slave port's revision
> > >
> > >     .include "${MASTERDIR}/Makefile"
> 
> Well, just to make sure I make my point clear; I simply explained how
> to give a master port and its slave ports different PORTREVISION
> values.  The `?=' operator was the point.

How about extend PORTREVISION to have both master and slave revision.
for example:
MASTERREVISION=1 in master port makefile
SLAVEREVISION=3 in slave port makefile
PORTREVISION=${MASTERREVISION}.${SLAVEREVISION}

Of course we need tool side changes.

Regards,
-- 
Tadayuki OKADA

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message