From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 5 14:01:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9B610656A3; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:01:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [IPv6:2a01:170:102f::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D668FC0A; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o15E0pZe071853; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:01:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o15E0p2T071852; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:00:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:00:51 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <201002051400.o15E0p2T071852@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, randi@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/6.4-PRERELEASE-20080904 (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:01:07 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE -> -STABLE and size of / X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, randi@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:01:09 -0000 Randi Harper wrote: > Marian Hettwer wrote: > > +1 vote for making / bigger. > > At least a size where a make installkernel runs through. > > This is going to happen. It's been on my to-do list for a while, as I > find it increasingly annoying. The default sizes of all mount points > need to be tweaked a bit. Be patient, there will be some new changes > going into sysinstall very soon. Revisiting sysinstall's default partition sizes is certainly a good idea. However, I think it makes a lot of sense to *not* install symbol files in /boot/kernel by default. I can't think of a good reason why they need to be there by default, and they're what causes the space problems for the root FS in the first place. Please change the default. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "If you think C++ is not overly complicated, just what is a protected abstract virtual base pure virtual private destructor, and when was the last time you needed one?" -- Tom Cargil, C++ Journal