From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 20:47:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF77416A420 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:47:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA9043D45 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:47:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8276D1A4E30; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:47:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 772BF5477E; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:47:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:47:10 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Don O'Neil Message-ID: <20060227204709.GA49399@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <44035BDB.2030109@cs.tu-berlin.de> <004e01c63bdd$56724b60$0300020a@mickey> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <004e01c63bdd$56724b60$0300020a@mickey> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, 'Bj?rn K?nig' Subject: Re: 4.X Binaries on 5.X or 6.X? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:47:12 -0000 --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:35:24PM -0800, Don O'Neil wrote: > I haven't tried running them yet, I'm just asking since I'm planning on > building a new server and would prefer to use 5.x or 6.x rather than 4.11 > which my old server is running.=20 >=20 > I guess the best way to find out is to try... I was just asking if there > _could_ be any issues. >=20 > If you were in my position, would you install 5.4 or 6.0? I noticed there > are quite a lot of changes in 6.0 and it requires at least 5.3 for upgrade > purposes... So my question is, is it really ready for 'prime time'?=20 Absolutely yes. Kris --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEA2VNWry0BWjoQKURAmv/AJ4t4TC+r+R3K/AxmlsLmtYYspNz3ACfZV/l O+pVaAh/s3BmPhQrQMyAzqA= =Zy2H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--