Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 07:45:43 -0700 From: Stephen Paskaluk <stephen.paskaluk@gmail.com> To: "R. Tyler Ballance" <tyler@tamu.edu> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible long double bug fix (Problem Report sparc64/55773) Message-ID: <d8623cc40412230645149a201@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1103799791.7216.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1103799791.7216.35.camel@localhost.localdomain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 05:03:11 -0600, R. Tyler Ballance <tyler@tamu.edu> wrote: > sap@ (of the MirOS project) has come up with a patch to fix this bug, > which in my rudimentary testing on my Ultra2 seems to prove that it > works. > The .diff file can be found here: > http://dero.tamu.edu/~tyler/code/freebsd/fpu_qp.diff It's based partly on the OpenBSD version of the same code. As a general thought on the sparc64 fpu code, I don't see why there's a need for the _QP_TTOQ macro at all, it only saves manually writing a handful of functions. It's true that you don't have to change each function in the event of a change to the overall routine, but I don't think that's much of an issue with this code. -- Stephen Paskaluk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d8623cc40412230645149a201>